Michigan House Bill 4362 eliminates the Michigan Business tax; however, on
May 12, 2011, State Representative Charles Brunner voted no on final passage of
House Bill 4362.
More info coming.
The Bay County taxpayers exists to fight for the right of the working people of Bay county to keep more of their hard earned money. We will oppose any tax increase at the state, county, and local level and work to cut the pork-barrel spending that necessitates those taxes.
Michigan House Bill 4362 eliminates the Michigan Business tax; however, on
May 12, 2011, State Representative Charles Brunner voted no on final passage of
House Bill 4362.
FileState Rep. Kenneth B. Horn in his Lansing office.
CourtesyBrunnerBAY CITY — State Rep. Charles Brunner says the Michigan Business Tax put “a tremendous burden” on small business.
Brunner, D-Bay City, is the target of a recall spearheaded by a Bay City man who takes issue with Brunner’s vote against legislation to repeal the tax.
In recall language filed today, Joseph A. Sylvester cites Brunner’s “no” vote on House Bill 4362 on May 12.
The bill, signed into law by Gov. Rick Snyder on May 26, replaced the Michigan Business Tax with a 6 percent corporate income tax. The bill also eliminated many individual income tax deductions and credits.
Brunner said HB 4362 was part of a larger package of bills.
“It was a combination of things,” said Brunner. “Basically, what I voted on was a package of bills that also included a huge tax increase, especially on senior citizens and retirees. Yes, I voted against House Bill 4362, but I also voted against the entire package, the state budget as it was introduced by the governor.”
The recall language now goes for a clarity hearing before the Bay County Election Commission, consisting of Bay County Clerk Cynthia A. Luczak, Probate Judge Karen A. Tighe and Treasurer Richard Brzezinski.
If the trio approve the language, Sylvester will have to obtain an as-yet undetermined number of signatures on recall petitions.
A tentative date for the hearing is 9 a.m. Monday, Aug. 22, in Courtroom 5 of the Bay County Courthouse.
http://www.mlive.com/news/bay-city/index.ssf/2011/08/rep_charles_brunner_responds_t.html
CourtesyBrunnerBAY CITY — A Bay City man upset with State Rep. Charles Brunner’s vote on the small business tax has filed initial paperwork to recall the legislator.
Joseph A. Sylvester, chairman of the Bay County Taxpayers Association and a former member of the Bay County Republican Party board of directors, said Brunner is “out of touch” and did not act in the public’s interest when he voted against House Bill 4362 on May 12.
The bill, signed into law by Gov. Rick Snyder on May 26, replaced the Michigan Business Tax with a 6 percent corporate income tax. The bill also eliminated many individual income tax deductions and credits.
“Mr. Brunner failed to repeal the Michigan Business Tax,” Sylvester said. “Small business are suffering. We need to support business in order for the community and economy to thrive.”
Brunner, D-Bay City, could not be reached for comment.
“There are more people in this community than just union workers,” said Sylvester. “It’s time someone reminded Mr. Brunner that he is not a union steward, but a representative of the whole community.”
The language now goes for a clarity hearing before the Bay County Election Commission, consisting of Bay County Clerk Cynthia A. Luczak, Probate Judge Karen A. Tighe and Treasurer Richard Brzezinski.
If the trio approve the language, Sylvester will have to obtain an as-yet undetermined number of signatures on recall petitions.
A tentative date for the hearing is 9 a.m. Monday, Aug. 22, in Courtroom 5 of the Bay County Courthouse.
Brunner, who took office Jan. 1, represents the cities of Auburn, Bay City and Essexville, as well as Bangor, Beaver, Frankenlust, Hampton, Merritt, Monitor, Portsmouth and Williams townships, and a portion of the city of Midland.
For Immediate Release
August 4, 2011
Bay County Taxpayers to Recall Rep. Charles Brunner
Bay City, MI —The Bay County Taxpayers Association will be filing a recall petition with the Bay County Clerk, Thursday August 4th at 2pm to recall Representative Charles Brunner for his vote against the repeal of the Michigan Business Tax which overwhelmingly passed both the House and Senate and was signed into law.
The text of the recall language is as follows: “Michigan House Bill 4362 eliminates the Michigan Business Tax; however, on May 12, 2011, State Representative Charles Brunner voted no on final passage of Michigan House Bill 4362.”
“There was just an article in the Bay City Times yesterday in which businessman Art Dore purchased the Hampton mall. Mr. Brunner’s vote against the repeal of the Michigan Business tax would have hampered someone like him who creates jobs and revives the community”. “There are more people in this community than just union workers and it’s time someone reminded Mr. Brunner that he is not a union steward but a representative of the whole community”, said Joe Sylvester, Chairman of the Bay County Taxpayers Association.
The Bay County Taxpayers Association is the largest organization in Bay County advocating fiscal conservatism.
For more information, contact Joe Sylvester at cheneygun@gmail.com.
http://www.bctaxpayers.
For those of you that have followed the career (I could just as easily say political career as they are the same thing for him) of Jeff Mayes you will see a disturbing trend in which he votes for special interest instead of the people. | 1. 2007 House Bill 5194: The 12% state income tax hike. (3 points) |
Voted Yes (0 points)
| 2. 2007 House Bill 5198: The extension of the state sales tax to certain services, later replaced by a 22% business tax hike. (3 points) |
Voted Yes (0 points)
| 3. 2007 Senate Bill 94: Michigan’s new business tax. Citizens collected nearly 375,000 signatures on a petition to eliminate the despised old Single Business Tax. The petition language stated that the SBT should be replaced with a “less burdensome tax”. What did the legislature do? Replaced the tax with the Michigan Business Tax which increased the net tax burden on businesses, and is perhaps even more complicated than the old SBT. (3 points) |
Voted Yes (0 points)
| 4. Senate Bill 229, Senate Bills 232-235, House Bills 4344, 4346, 4348, 4350 and 4360: Increases in state spending from 2007 to 2008. (3 points) |
Voted to increase spending by $1,470,045,900 (0 points)
| 5. 2007 House Bill 4261. This bill authorized a new 2% tax on Kent County and Lansing hotels. The convention and tourism bureaus in Kent County and Lansing wanted more money, but apparently couldn’t get enough local hotels to send it to them voluntarily. (2 points) |
Voted Yes (0 points)
| 6. 2008 House Bill 5804: This bill funds the state’s Department of History, Arts and Libraries. Last year, the state spent $49.5 million on this Department. Governor Granholm recommended a spending increase to $52.7 million but that wasn’t enough for Speaker Dillon and the House leaders. They passed this bill increasing art spending to $57.1 million – a 13% increase. What’s in YOUR wallet? (2 points) |
Voted Yes (0 points)
| 7. 2008 Senate Bill 1107: This bill increased spending for school aid by almost half a billion dollars. The House added a provision allowing the Detroit Public Schools (DPS) to continue to be the only “district of the first class” in Michigan which prohibits Detroit’s district from facing additional competition from charter schools. The DPS was given this extra ‘protection’ for free. No audits, reforms or improvement plans were expected of the DPS in the legislation. (2 points) |
Voted Yes (0 points)
| 8. House Bills 4865, 4866, 5257 and 5258: Fee increases. Back in Governor Granholm’s first term, a whole slew of fee hikes were enacted on everything from gasoline to business licenses and annual reports required of non-profit corporations. The fee increases ranged from 25% to 100%. But don’t worry, citizens were told, these fee hikes are only “temporary” and will go away in 2007. The legislature put the “sunset date” for these temporary fee hikes right in the legislation. Then on Sept 30, 2007, the day the fees increases were scheduled to go away, the legislature passed new legislation keeping the fee hikes in place. But don’t worry, these fees will go back down on September 30, 2012. It says so right in the legislation. (2 points) |
Voted to increase fees by $10,761,800 (0 points)
Total Points: 0/20
Grade: F-